NoiseAware

NoiseAware_Logotype_FullColor_2.png

Overview

NoiseAware is an Internet of Things (IoT) startup that sells a device and associated monitoring service to automatically detect noise pollution at any location.  Noise pollution can include anything from loud traffic locations to parties, or just unacceptable levels of noise after a certain time period.  When such an event occurs the property manager is alerted and can take appropriate action.  Their technology is smart enough that one off background noises (such as sirens) will not activate an alert.  

NoiseAware is currently focused on selling to landlords, especially for short-term rentals such as people listing on AirBnb, HomeAway, etc.  Their next area of expansion is the outdoor monitoring for pools, hot tubs, and patios where noise disturbances travel much further. The team has excellent traction with customers in 14 countries and most of the 50 states. 

They are based in Dallas, Texas and have 10 employees.

 

Why I like Them

As is often mentioned, "hardware companies are hard".  That being said I like that NoiseAware uses their hardware as a lead into their subscription service and have a very distinct (yet broad) niche with little competition.  They have a distinct advantage over general purpose at home IoT devices, such as Amazon's Echo, in that they only listen for noise pollution, so privacy is not violated.  Any landlord will know noise complaints can easily cost a lot of money and signal damage being done to the property.  The company has grown extremely fast with the popularity of AirBnb and the industry of multi-AirBnb property managers that have sprung up in the last few years.

I also really like that this technology has surprisingly widespread applications.  The obvious use case is for rentals (a large market as it is) but the team has received a ton of interest from hotel chains, city officials, school dormitories, senior living communities - basically anywhere people sleep has shown an interest in this type of monitoring system.

Disclosure:  I have spoken to members of the team.

Emerging Trend: Voice Synthesis and the Next Generation of Fake News

Voice synthesis is the the next generation of audio editing.  It has been called “the Photoshop of voice" and is a rapidly emerging technology which allows software to convert text into speech synthesis of a voice that is completely indistinguishable from the real thing.  It allows anyone to edit recordings of what someone has said such that it sounds like the person actually has said the edit or even flat out create artificial sound-alike voice recordings of anyone in the world. 

Voice synthesis software works by taking in sound clips from the person you want to copy as inputs, with the software able to convert these to make any sound or combination of sounds (i.e. words and actual sentences).  Examples of these new types of software include Adobe Voco, WaveNet, and the recently launched Descript.  

My concern is around the ethical issues and the next level of fakes news this type of technology will give rise to.  It is extremely scary to think about the power of anyone having the ability to make it sound like world and corporate leaders have said anything you want.  It also extends to being able to create songs and albums sounding like they were sung by your favorite celebrity without their consent.  Even worse, it is nearly indistinguishable from real voice recordings with no way to verify if the audio is real or fake. 

There many legitimate use cases for this type of software, especially for members of the media and the record industry, but I do have a lot of concern that voice synthesis technology will enable a more insidious and dangerous form of fake news and manipulation.   Being able to make anyone say anything with no way to prove it is a scary prospect with a number of potentially malicious use cases.

You can see this technology in action on Barack Obama below as well as a demonstration of Descript's software.

Investor Discussion Series: Mehtab Bhogal of Karta Ventures

Recently I had the pleasure of a lively conversation with consumer focused investor Mehtab Bhogal of Karta Ventures.  Mehtab is an experienced entrepreneur in the consumer goods space and active investor with a unique strategy.  You can read more about his story here.

Consumer investing is notoriously hard - what do you look for that stands out?

I actually think consumer is easier than technology investing as valuations in tech are ridiculous right now, plus the tech best deals go straight to a small handful of VCs anyways.  Conversely, consumer brands are very straightforward to value, as you can usually go off an EBITDA multiplier.  

Moreover, outcomes are less binary than tech because it's relatively easy to get your money out of consumer companies via dividends. Companies are also less likely to need subsequent financing rounds as consumer brands tend to generate substantial cash flow quickly. That cash flow allows consumer brands to do things that most tech companies can't do without going to a specialized lender, like utilizing debt. Suppliers are also an easy way for consumer brands selling physical products to quickly improve cash flow if needed as well.

I don't look for anything in particular with consumer other than my ability to add value myself and via my network of contractors/people that can help train the companies I invest in to improve core operations. A reputable, strong brand (or the ability to build a good brand!) is vital though as that's what keeps other companies from knocking off your product.

What are your thoughts on venture capitalist getting into more traditional consumer companies such as Allbirds?

They will likely keep moving in as margins have become so much more attractive thanks to direct to consumer channels.  Direct to consumer has opened up a lot of doors that simply didn't exist 15 - 18 years ago. 

Especially early stage for consumer - how do you test whether the product has any real legs or is just a fad?

The company needs organic growth. It might be tempting to look at a successful crowdfunded company via a platform like Kickstarter and assume the same sales will carry on post-crowdfunding but these products are often too niche because backers of crowdfunding campaigns are their own niche.

I also test companies I’m looking at by running a bunch of PPC tests on their product (with their permission of course) to see how receptive people are to a product and how much growth might be possible.  Google, Facebook, and Bing are great for this. Facebook in particular is great for this because you're throwing a product out in front of an audience instead of those searching for a specific solution like with Google/Bing search ads. If a product just well via Facebook ads, it's very likely to scale up nicely.

What consumer trends are you interested in investing in 2018?

Smart drugs/nootropics. Companies in the space are largely made up of those who jumped into the industry because they are passionate about nootropics, but don't necessarily have any meaningful level of sophistication when it comes to handling the business end of things. Many of the companies I've looked at in the space don't even have retargeting pixels on their websites which is...odd. I nearly launched a smart drug company a few years back but ended up working on something else instead. 

What are some resources you use to stay up to date on consumer trends?

Mostly a network of people I know or reach out to in the space.

How do you source your deals?

Sourcing deals in the consumer space is much more difficult than tech because there isn't a go-to platform or place for it. Platforms like AngelList are largely focused on tech, and the consumer brands doing deals on those platforms are often blatantly bad deals. 

The other major issue is that well managed consumer brands will generate cash flow quickly, which gives them access to affordable debt facilities. This negates any real need for cash, which means as an investor you have to be able to do more than just write a check and be hands off. You need to be able to show them exactly how you can help take them from doing $700,000 - $2M a year to $5M - $10M in 2 years.

As a result of the aforementioned issues, I've expanded my focus to doing my own deal assembly, buying IP, and building companies around that. This means hiring a CEO, providing them with funding and any other resources they need, etc... 

How important is the brand when you are looking to invest?

A strong brand provides the company with a good moat to protect them from competitors and knock offs. When seeding a deal, companies typically have little to no brand value but that's something that's relatively easy to building a clear identity, a reputation for only making excellent products, and by focusing on delivering amazing customer service.

What do you think of all these Fulfilled by Amazon consumer businesses becoming more mainstream over the last few years?

I don’t like companies that rely on Amazon.  Amazon can and does shut down or disrupt those selling on Amazon and it's an issue that is notoriously hard to deal with. Worse yet, being overly reliant on one platform heavily impacts the multiple you're likely to receive for your business when you sell. If I company I invest in is relying heavily on a particular platform, whether it's an influencer, a marketplace, or a social platform, the first thing I try to do is build out other sales channels to hedge risk.

Any investors you personally look up to?

Warren Buffett in one of my all-time favorites because his philosophy really resonates with me and it's managed to work for him for decades. Ray Dalio is another one of my favorite because he is amazing at building systems...and he's built some of the best in the world that have scaled up beautifully. 

Any predictions for 2018?

Blockchain technology will keep going and hopefully crypto cools off.

Anything else you think potential consumer investors or consumer entrepreneurs should know?

  • People need to get better at testing to identify niches.  They need products that target a niche but are very shareable outside that niche.  Testing only costs $300 - $500 if you have the patience to learn how to write copy, run ads, and create landing pages.  Facebook is a good platform for testing this type of thing for consumer products.  If you do well on Facebook then your product has a ton of potential for organic growth. I think a lot of entrepreneurs skip this step because they want to express themselves creatively instead of building a profitable business.
  • If you're not handling manufacturing yourself, take the time to find a great manufacturer. Very few people realize this, and it sounds obvious, but manufacturers can make or break a company. A great manufacturer will provide you with financing, introduce you to key retailers, help with R&D, etc... A lot of entrepreneurs seem to go with the first guy they find on sites like Alibaba. Don't do that, because you really do get what you pay for. Our manufacturing partner - Dunlop/MXR - for our guitar pedal company Horizon Devices has helped us immensely in more ways than we could ever ask for. Even if someone offered to build the same products for us at half the price we wouldn't switch over because nobody can match what they've done for us.
  • Never compete on price, the bigger players will win that game and put you out of business. They can afford to bleed money if they have to because their warchest is massive. You'll also end up attracting a very...difficult kind of customer.
  • Stage capital carefully, especially before you establish demand. Test any idea you have for the company and then double down when a test does well.
  • Always utilize pre-orders when possible.  If you can’t get demand before launch, your product probably doesn't have that much potential. 
  • Everything is negotiable. Unless you hear something coming out of the mouth of the person that actually owns the company you're negotiating with, then don't take their answer too seriously. We've bypassed $100,000+ MoQs by cutting around intermediaries and speaking with major CEOs. 
  • If everything is executed beautifully, it only takes $15,000 to $25,000 to build out a company doing a few million in revenue in the consumer space. $50,000 to $75,000 provides you with a lot more room for error, but you don't really need much money to get started.

Pando

Screen Shot 2017-12-30 at 8.21.13 AM.png

Overview

Pando is a startup developing a new insurance like product focused around covering individuals in high volatility, winner take all careers.  Their product gives downside career protection for individuals in certain superstar careers such as professional sports or entrepreneurship where success is rare but the financial reward is often high.  To do this they take individuals early on in their high risk career and put them into groups or "pools" of people with other similar risk profiles and careers.  A portion of the future earnings (or equity for startup founders) above pre-defined thresholds of those who become the superstars are shared with the other members of the pool.  Basically they create a career safety net by allowing every member of the pool to invest in the success of every other pool member via a diversified portfolio.

An example that illustrates the underlying problem is the team's first market of professional baseball players.  A first round draft pick has an expected career earnings of $40M+ but has about a 50% chance of never playing a day in the MLB and earning nothing.  If this player is successful and doesn't suffer injuries they give up some of the $40M they could potentially make to other members of the pool.  On the flip side, if they aren't successful and earn nothing they would still receive income from other successful members of the pool they are in.  Basically, the winner super stars provide a safety net through a payout to everyone else in their pool who might not have had the same level or any success.

These pool sizes vary based on participant preference.  Individuals choose to pool for one of three reasons: lower career volatility, ability to invest in others, or a network of peers financially aligned with their success. Currently Pando Pooling is trying different pooling models where they either let pool members self select or use their proprietary predictive algorithms to offer optimal matching.

The team is currently less than 10 people and based in San Francisco, California.

 

Why I like Them

Pando Pooling's product idea is extremely innovative and one of those you wonder why no one had thought of decades ago.  In hindsight it seems obvious to give high volatility careers a safety net, but the devil is in the details with contract terms and the determination of who is in the pools of risk vital for their success.  The team has invented a novel solution for de-risking those with careers that face highly bifurcated outcomes.  Although extremely early they have several pools already running, and have found deep interest among customers with strong traction especially among professional baseball players.

Even more creative than their product itself is the firm's business model.  Unlike in traditional insurance, Pando Pooling will not be taking any premiums but instead will take a portion of a pool's payout, even if that may be years from when the policy is first created.  What this does is basically give the company a stream of cash generating assets (their pools or policies) that can be potentially borrowed against or even securitized and sold off to investors.  In the long term this might not just be a new form of insurance but a new type of securitization asset class similar to something like catastrophe bonds that are becoming more popular among institutional investors.

Overall, I love the innovation here and the creation of a new type of product, business model, and potentially a new financial asset class all in one.  However, there are extreme risks with the success of this business depending on accurately assessing career risks of members (having several pools where there are no payouts would likely affect popularity and sign up) as well as the lack of cashflow to the business itself, especially in the first few years before the pools start paying out.

Disclosure:  I have spoken to members of the team.

Some Predictions for 2018

With the end of the year 2017 fast approaching it’s time for some 2018 predictions.

  • Crypto Mania Accelerates - However, Bitcoin’s ability as a money transfer platform will be questioned more and more due to its numerous scalability challenges.  Other cryptocurrencies will become the mainstream focus and front and center with leading candidates including Ether and Ripple.  Initial Coin Offerings will continue but we see will the first serious cryptocurrency regulation from world governments ranging from the US to South Korea.  This will cause a pullback even though I doubt it will stop the mania long term.  The number of crypto lawsuits will rise as more tokens are revealed to be scams.  Tezos is just the beginning of the legal mess that will emerge.  We certainly haven’t seen peak crypto yet.
  • Voice Technology Continues to Emerge - We will see better and more accurate voice interfaces as the year goes on, with novel applications starting to emerge especially with Alexa.  However, it won’t go mainstream in 2018 and will likely be several more years before voice sees mass adoption and overshadows keyboards and touchscreens as the interface of choice for computing.
  • The Juggernaut of Amazon Keeps Growing & Winning - Amazon will continue to expand into more markets and dominate them.  From hints in 2017 it seems like pharmacy and healthcare along with retail are the next major areas the company will push into.  Either way I’ll be betting on Amazon wherever they go.  If the stock market bonanza we saw in 2017 continues in 2018, we will very likely see Amazon as the first or second trillion dollar market cap company.  I give it a 30% chance that we see another notable acquisition such as Whole Foods that we saw in 2017.
  • Augmented Reality (AR) Gains Some Steam but it Will be a Long Time Before it's Actually Usable - AR will continue to emerge but is certainly no where close to prime time.   Magic Leap's recent announcement of its glasses and developer offering will help this trajectory but the technology has a way to go.  Apple will potentially open the kimono with regards to what it's developing for AR in 2018 but I wouldn’t be surprised if it isn’t until 2019 that we get more solid product details.  The cell phone will continue to be the platform that promotes and grows AR usage by consumers.
  • Softbank and Startups - Softbank’s buying spree and pumping up of startup prices will continue pushing up startup valuations, especially with their new Vision 2 fund rumored to be double its first fund at $200B.  This will make growth and later stage investing more competitive but will prove a boon to early stage investors by providing liquidity.  It will be a great time to be a startup founder who’s company has hit the growth stage.
  • Uber - I think we’ve seen peak Uber in 2017 and the company will be on a slowly downward trajectory for the next several years.  It will stabilize its core business and do the long overdue house keeping, but won’t see the huge leaps in its valuation any more.  Unlikely to become a Groupon like story anytime soon but certainly could be in the next five to ten years.
  • Self Driving Vehicles will Still be an Early Stage Technology - We will see the first self driving cars on the road as more than test vehicles.  My bet is it starts with the trucking industry and grows faster there before consumers really start any sort of adoption.  However, we are still years away from any sort of mainstream consumer offering and consumer trust and adoption.  
  • Tesla - As much as I love this company and its products, the numbers and personnel changes reveal serious difficulties with the business model.  As long as capital remains cheap they will continue going but in the event of any sort of recession or pullback in the capital markets they will be severely pressed to continue as a going concern.
  • Tech as a Whole - We will see the first notable regulatory crackdowns on big tech companies (long overdue) from both the US and Europe.  We will likely see this on multiple fronts from the monopoly’s of the big 4, the fake news of the media platforms, to the business practices of Uber.
  • AI Hype will Cool Down (Just a Bit) - The big technology investing theme of 2017 has been AI with every company and startup suddenly having an AI strategy.  Of course most of these aren’t actual AI but more traditional statistical analysis and modeling repackaged for AI hungry investors.  I think investors will recognize that the pace of the technology isn’t as fast as they think right now and there is still a ton of work to be done before it has bottom line impacts on consumers and businesses.  

Either way I'm excited to see what 2018 brings.